My speech in the House of banks were used 
Mr. President, I will try to abstract from the previous somewhat intemperate speeches and try to focus in this first part of my speech, I hope to be as synthetic as possible, the spirit that prevailed in general in all sessions. Indeed Mrs.
MP Conti said something that I basically vindicated unlike the last time the House discussed the problem with high impact safety by increasing penalties the initiative known as "law Blumberg," which later was clearly a failure.
Today we are trying to address this problem with an initiative linked to the improvement of security service in the banking and financial institutions in our country. In this regard, I that the project in question is synthetic and modest, has the virtue-rescue deputy initiative of Mr. Milman to include the issue on the public agenda.
However, the three measures proposed in concrete form, that relating to clause b) of Article 2 referred to the treasures, while amending existing legislation is not directly related to the problem of leaking bank.
Moreover, subsection a) of the bill is an innovation that raises have lanes and ATM protection system with a sufficient level of reserves.
Paragraph c), referred to inhibitors of cell phones, We generated some doubts. That is why we propose, and so I announced to Mr. MP Milman, an addition to that article to the effect that if a device is inhibition does not affect alarm systems and wireless connection between bank branches and police federal and provincial. Otherwise, instead of improving the situation would be making it worse. Member Mr. Heller also made reference to other issues that may generate inhibitors.
is true that the Central Bank is working as a guiding and regulating banking security standards. The information we have is that at the meeting of the Central Bank board to be held tomorrow will approve a series of regulations, for example, changing the system of television cameras, the change from analogue to digital, including placement of an external camera input focus to local initiative we are adopting today, the incorporation of visual inhibitors to enable the line of sight from the boxes into the room and not from the room toward the line of cases, management of queues, the Turnera, the rear cargo ATMs in instead of front loading, training of security officers, and increase the change in coins, so as to avoid a lot of influx of people around the situation.
claim the spirit of the project because it has the virtue of provoking this session. We understand that most of the speeches have raised contributions. We must recognize that the session has been influenced by a spirit of harmony in order to find a solution to these problems. Since then it has been emphasized in the glass as half empty rather than the half-full. Just
issue I referred to Blumberg. As many accusations have been made by some gentlemen of alleged inaction on public policy of the state and provincial jurisdictions, I must say that the offense was generated by the "effect" Blumberg, kidnapping for ransom has disappeared in Argentina. This loss is a finding that emerges from the application of a series of public policies, where the national state was actively involved from his security force, the Federal Police, for the various agencies, including the criminal intelligence to help solve this type of crime that generated a movement around the issue Blumberg.
Then, we can see that data from the side of the glass as half full. Certainly, the crimes of kidnapping for ransom had at some point a high impact on society in Argentina and created a situation of unrest in the society as a whole. But this state much criticized and devalued solved the problem, so much so that today almost no kidnappings in Argentina. This is a fact of life and I do not think you have to be ashamed of saying things that the State is doing well and have been resolved positively.
is clear that the approach to security is not a matter that can be solved in one place. In general, progressive approaches to resolve the issue indicate a series of multidisciplinary actions. It is difficult to split the security issues of social problems and is difficult to believe that social policies, including employment and not having a direct impact on the security issue.
Kidnappings extortion is a crime much more complex than the bank leaks. Three or four years ago we saw that required a certain degree of organization and logistics criminal, who do not have bank leaks, crimes are much more precarious, more justifiable from a different point of view that some Members have very well explained and analyzed . The State has been able to answer such questions, making sure the state can provide answers to all problems it will pose safety and may be progressing each day based on improving each of the services social.
I want to stress the glass half full because they certainly do not want to leave with the feeling that things can not be made or that the state can not address this problem. I also wish floating feeling that the national government has done nothing to resolve a number of problems that have to do with safety. I gave this example because it seems palpable and powerful, it is verifiable and can spread peace to the whole population.
surface was talk about the issue of drug trafficking, and I want to also vindicate our government. The truth is that you can analyze the problem of drug trafficking without a serious consideration of what is meant by addiction and without condemning a policy of more than twenty or thirty years has tried to address drug trafficking from criminalize it consumes and the last link in the chain, partly because it is looking at the problem.
The discussion should be comprehensive and must admit that this policy, which in these twenty to thirty years criminalized the consumer and the last link in the chain has failed, it tried to reduce demand and all we did was increase supply thus, it implies a stop at absolutely wrong and incorrect. And our government has done a lot. And so has the Minister to which nearly forced the opposition MPs have strongly criticized, especially when he was minister Interior. I am referring to Anibal Fernandez, who now continues to fulfill duties as head of the Cabinet.
The national government has long formed the National Coordinating Commission for Public Policy on the Prevention and Control of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs, Organized Crime and Corruption within the 1.359/2009 decree.
The commission is composed of specialists without party identification, absolutely recognized by all. It has produced reports and papers that are available to the deputies and the executive branch. This has shown a willingness and concern from our government about a topic that was discussed repeatedly by some deputies.
You know that the committee is coordinated by Dr. Monica Cuñarro, with the participation of Alberto Calabrese, Patrick Llerena, Horacio Cattani, Maria Vazquez Acuna, Eva Giberti, Alicia Gillone, Monica Napoli and Carlos Damin, all academic, intellectual, theoretical and Many professionals of recognized competence who are taking a look quite different from how it has to address and pursue the issue. So I think the national government in this sense has a lot to prove, much to say. Furthermore, this decree Such coordination is Secretary of State level, under the Chief of Staff. Here is where you are developing each of these policies that began first with the problem of addiction then added issues that I mentioned earlier, such as transnational crime within the framework of the decree 1.359/2009.
said all that, a breakthrough that our block will vote yes, we will propose an amendment in subsection c) of Article 2.
Also, I will try to answer some critical policies that unnecessarily we did on the end of this debate.
Last Thursday, when I got home in Rosario, was dining and turned on the TV. There he saw, how could it be otherwise, the Deputy Carrio TN. Speaking to reporters Van Der Kooy and Blank said a number of issues. At one point he told reporters: "You can not believe that a Security Minister may be radical?" I do not know why the radicals can not have security minister. He continued, "The Security Minister has to be someone like Patricia Bullrich, which is of Peronism." Then I said: "Poor Patricia, the fate he got."
What happens is that Patricia, as well as rebuke, insult and discredit the Minister Anibal Fernandez, in his address been shown to have some ideas about security policy. The question is: Why was not applied when in government? (Applause.)
same when it comes to political funding by the money politics that exist in black and illicit financing. There! There is no wrong.
Is there anything worse than a President giving out the money in the Oval Office, giving it to a secretary to finance the operation of the Banelco? (Applause.)
Is there actually worse in Argentina's political history of illegal financing, silver black, which was performed with the operation of the Banelco?
PRO I scream, look I said nothing and had much to say about the security issue, so quiet!
When it comes to these situations, trying to discredit through a discussion that came naturally channeled along a path quite normal, in which each gave their input about the security issues, I think we have to talk to back rather wide. There are some who talk and talk and they were in power when things happened that were emblematized in politics in Argentina.
When talking about what he had to do a secretary or a minister of security with the police, I guess you will not have been thinking about Enrique Mathov, because fault He died many Argentines in the square May 19 and December 20, 2001.
So I think in this kind of questions should be sufficiently cautious to mention each of the issues.
We want to say with absolute clarity that it is not necessary to speak up every day to solve the problems of insecurity. This was demonstrated when specify and clarify what happened to the kidnappings in Argentina. You do need to have public policies that permanently reduce social inequality and create a climate of improved quality of life of all Argentines. Beyond the effort
Mr Deputy Aguad, we recognize, appreciate and respect, we believe that our government has improved the quality of life for all Argentines during these seven years.
In our management we have created five million new jobs, 140 000 new companies, while between 98 and 2002 40 000 businesses were lost in our country. We have the basic universal child allowance, increase the number of retirees and pensioners in Argentina, there are policies for growth and investment policies. In Argentina, invests and grows. The economic prospects for this year and next are positive, and to each of the problems we face do not look to the side, we address and resolve.
When Blumberg presented the problem of resolving the issue as I just demonstrated. In the Argentina of today there is kidnapping for ransom, and the problem of leaks bank so to resolve, taking each of the corners of Argentina better quality of life and increased safety for all Argentines. (Applause.)
